I know I complain a lot about the DUI laws here in California. There is much improvement to be made with regard to how law enforcement enforces drunk driving laws and how prosecutors prosecute drunk driving laws. Having said all that, at least weâ€™re not in Canada.
Section 253 of the Criminal Code of Canada was effectively changed in December of 2018 which gave law enforcement the authority to seek breath samples from people who might have been driving under the influence of alcohol.
Here in California, an officer must have probable cause that a person was under the influence before they could arrest them on suspicion of a DUI. Only then was a person required to provide either a breath or a blood sample. Prior to that arrest, any breath sample provided was voluntary on behalf of the driver.
Under Canadaâ€™s new law, police officers no longer need to have â€œreasonable suspicionâ€ that a person had consumed alcohol to force that person to take a breathalyzer. Police could demand breath samples from people at their home, in a bar, or at a restaurant. If the person refuses, they could be arrested and charged, and if convicted, can face a fine and a driving suspension.
Notwithstanding the potential to arrest a person who was not driving under the influence of alcohol, but rather lawfully drinking in their home or elsewhere, supporters of the law point to the use of another â€œtoolâ€ in combating drunk driving.
â€œPolice miss a lot of impaired drivers,â€ said Toronto police spokesman Sgt. Brett Moore. â€œItâ€™s just a really good, strong message that thereâ€™s a real high likelihood that if you get stopped by police, youâ€™re going to get asked to submit to a breath test.â€
Not surprisingly, Mothers Against Drunk Driving Canada also supports the new law asserting that mandatory alcohol screening will make the roads safer.
Donâ€™t get me wrong, I too support making roads safer, but not at the risk of arresting, charging, and punishing people for doing something perfectly lawful. Iâ€™m not the only one.
â€œItâ€™s ridiculous, itâ€™s basically criminalizing you having a drink at your kitchen table,â€ Paul Doroshenko, a Vancouver criminal defense lawyer who specializes in impaired driving cases, told Global News. â€œIf you start to drink after you get home, the police show up at your door, they can arrest you, detain you, take you back to the (police station) and you can be convicted because your blood alcohol concentration was over 80 milligrams (per 100 millilitres of blood) in the two hours after you drove.â€
The Canadian Civil Liberties Association also expressed concern about Canadaâ€™s new law saying that mandatory alcohol testing will disproportionally affect racial minorities who might be unfairly targeted by law enforcement.
Notwithstanding its problems, Minister of Justice and Attorney General Jody Wilson-Raylould believes that the law with withstand judicial scrutiny when it is challenged in court and is in support of the new law.
â€œImpaired driving is the leading criminal cause of death and injury in Canada,â€ said Wilson-Raybould in December. â€œI believe these reforms will result in fewer road deaths and fewer Canadian families devastated by the effects of an impaired driver. This is one of the most significant changes to the laws related to impaired driving in more than 40 years and is another way that we are modernizing the criminal justice system.â€
It could take years for legal challenges to make their way through Canadaâ€™s appeal courts and even the Supreme Court of Canada. Until then, people, all people in Canada, are subject to a law that could find them in legal trouble even though theyâ€™ve done nothing wrong.