It was only a couple of months ago that tens of thousands of breathalyzer results were called into question in Massachusetts, affecting countless DUI cases. It appears New Jersey is dealing with a similar issue now that the stateâ€™s highest court ruled that 20,667 breathalyzer results were faulty and therefore inadmissible in the DUI cases where the results were used to secure convictions.
The ruling stems from a case that begun more than two years ago after the attorney for a woman by the name of Eileen Cassidy was notified by the state that the breath results were possibly faulty. At the time the attorney was notified, Cassidy was two weeks into a 180-day sentence on a third-time DUI. Cassidy then filed a lawsuit which led to the appointment of a special master to determine the reliability of the breathalyzer results.
Cassidyâ€™s lawsuit led to the charging of Sergeant Marc W. Dennis with falsely certifying that he had followed proper calibration procedures when calibrating breathalyzers used in DUI stops. The court, in its recent ruling, concluded that the results of the breathalyzers calibrated by Dennis, called Alcotests, were untrustworthy.
â€œConfidence in the reliability of instruments of technology used as evidence is of paramount importance,â€ Justice Walter Timpone wrote for the court. â€œUnfortunately, alleged human failings have cast doubt on the calibration process.â€
In addition to determining that the results of the breathalyzers were faulty, the court also vacated Cassidyâ€™s conviction. Unfortunately, Cassidy passed away from cancer in March, never allowing her to see her case vacated by the court.
That, however, didnâ€™t stop her attorney, Michael R. Hobbie, from continuing to fight for her.
While the court vacated Cassidyâ€™s conviction, the New Jersey Supreme Court failed to enunciate in its ruling who could challenge their conviction or exactly how to challenge their conviction.
â€œWith respect to the other 20,667, their cases werenâ€™t vacated,â€ said Hobbie. â€œThey just going to get notified that the breath test in their case has been deemed inadmissible and they should seek whatever remedy is available to them.â€
County prosecutors have already notified thousands of people whose cases may have been affected by the faulty breathalyzer results. The New Jersey Supreme Court, however, has now ordered state authorities to notify everyone whose faulty breath test was used in their case that the results are inadmissible.
â€œWeâ€™ll be issuing guidance shortly for our county prosecutors and municipal prosecutors over how to handle those cases,â€ said Gurbir Grewal, the New Jersey attorney general.
Although the court declaring the results of the breathalyzers inadmissible is a step in the right direction, ask yourself: How much is it going to cost those people affected by the faulty breathalyzer to legally challenge their conviction (after many, Iâ€™m sure, have already spent thousands of dollars to fight the underlying DUI charge in the first place)? As Iâ€™ve pointed out many times in previous posts and as Iâ€™m sure youâ€™re aware, lawyers are not cheap. Should these people have to bear the burden, financial or otherwise, to remedy something that would not have occurred but for the actions of a corrupt law enforcement officer trying to secure convictions of people who may have been innocent?
Sergeant Dennis was indicted in 2016 and is currently facing criminal charges.