Yes. Consider this article from a past edition of the Wilkes-Barre Times-Leader:
Man Blames Chewing Tobacco for DUI Charge
Naticoke, Penn. Ã¢â‚¬â€œ Could chewing tobacco make a man legally drunk?
John Daniel Drury Sr. thinks so.
Drury, who faces a drunken driving charge, told Nanticoke police that the brand of chewing tobacco he uses, Red Man Select, contains Tennessee Whiskey.
Police said Drury, 42, of Pine Street in the Hanover Section of Nanticoke, failed a series of field sobriety tests. A breath test Drury took showed an alcohol level of 0.144 percent, police said.
Mr. Drury is right. But how can a tiny amount of Tennessee Whiskey in a wad of chewing tobacco cause a 0.144% reading, you ask?
These breath machines arenÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t terribly bright. Put simplistically, to obtain the percentage of alcohol in the blood they are basically programmed to multiply the amount by 2100 times (called the partition ratio) to get the equivalent amount in the blood. This is because the alcohol in the lung air (called alveolar air) has been greatly attenuated in the process of being transferred from the blood into the lungs. In other words, the machine is programmed to assume that the sample being tested is alveolar air. If the alcohol has not passed through the body and into the lungs, however, but is still in the mouth, the machine is multiplying the alcohol 2100 times when it should not be multiplying it at all. And it only takes a microscopic amount of alcohol to get a high reading if itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s being multiplied 2100 times.
And even if the chewing tobacco didn’t contain whiskey, guess what absorbs alcohol when it’s consumed and stays inside the cheek, gums and teeth? This, of course, is one of the reasons why cops are instructed to make sure there are no “foreign objects” in the suspect’s mouth before breathing into the machine (something that, in real practice, they rarely do — any more than you would inspect the inside of a stranger’s mouth).