<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Ponders Forced Blood Draws in DUI Cases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Everett</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-827587</link>
		<dc:creator>Everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 06:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=3672#comment-827587</guid>
		<description>Your style is really unique compared to other people I have read 
stuff from. Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity,
Guess I&#039;ll just book mark this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your style is really unique compared to other people I have read<br />
stuff from. Thanks for posting when you have the opportunity,<br />
Guess I&#8217;ll just book mark this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana the Future of DUI Defense?</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-289000</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Driving Under the Influence of Marijuana the Future of DUI Defense?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 15:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=3672#comment-289000</guid>
		<description>[...] US Supreme Court has an active case where it will determine the constitutionality of forcing a defendant to provide a blood [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] US Supreme Court has an active case where it will determine the constitutionality of forcing a defendant to provide a blood [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Due Consideration - My Note Book</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-280007</link>
		<dc:creator>Due Consideration - My Note Book</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=3672#comment-280007</guid>
		<description>[...] not taken these laws to their logical conclusion with police-state checkpoints (now with blood extraction&#160;and forced catheterization), I might never have been forced to consider the subject enough to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not taken these laws to their logical conclusion with police-state checkpoints (now with blood extraction&nbsp;and forced catheterization), I might never have been forced to consider the subject enough to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Due Consideration &#171; The Honest Courtesan</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-279525</link>
		<dc:creator>Due Consideration &#171; The Honest Courtesan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=3672#comment-279525</guid>
		<description>[...] not taken these laws to their logical conclusion with police-state checkpoints (now with blood extraction and forced catheterization), I might never have been forced to consider the subject enough to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not taken these laws to their logical conclusion with police-state checkpoints (now with blood extraction and forced catheterization), I might never have been forced to consider the subject enough to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RALPH COURTNEY</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2013/01/10/supreme-court-ponders-forced-blood-draws-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-253188</link>
		<dc:creator>RALPH COURTNEY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=3672#comment-253188</guid>
		<description>I do not understant how they can force you to let them ram a neddle in you to take evidence from within your owm body.
Is that forceing to give evidence against yourself?
And why should any officer have the right to do this on there own?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not understant how they can force you to let them ram a neddle in you to take evidence from within your owm body.<br />
Is that forceing to give evidence against yourself?<br />
And why should any officer have the right to do this on there own?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
