Comments on: Prosecution’s Alcohol & Drug Expert a Fraud

By: bedbathbeyond

bedbathbeyond — Sun, 12 May 2013 21:23:39 +0000

Twenty five percent space of the town is under the green cowl
that makes this city additional viable and recent particularly within the monsoon season.
Some people will rely on transferring data between flash
drives and their home computers, or sending what they wish to have printed to a proxy, such as Fed – Ex.
Whenever you rent a book from them, they plant a tree to show the benefits of renting books.

By: http://cnatrainingtips.net

http://cnatrainingtips.net — Wed, 24 Apr 2013 06:46:19 +0000

Write more, thats all I have to say. Literally, it seems
as though you relied on the video to make your point.
You obviously know what youre talking about, why
waste your intelligence on just posting videos
to your weblog when you could be giving us something enlightening to read?

By: Jamie

Jamie — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:38:03 +0000

There have been so many issues in Texas regarding forensic science in general. Besides serious confirmation bias during analysis, many of the analysts themselves were very incompetent especially in El Paso and Houston. Thanks for the article!

By: DUI-The Constitution Need Not Apply

DUI-The Constitution Need Not Apply — Tue, 10 Jul 2012 17:12:21 +0000

That is tragic. Hopefully, Mr. Turnage pays a staggering price for his misdeeds.
In Kansas, prosecuting attorneys use Kansas Dept. of Health and Environment Breath Alcohol Program supervisors and laboratory improvement specialists to testify as experts in DUI cases. These officials spend a great deal of time traveling the state to testify in trials. They have sought to ‘homogenize’ testimony and make it uniform throughout the state. These BAP personnel consider prosecutors and law enforcement their ‘customers’. They act as members of the prosecution, cover mistakes of the police, and at least one of them is willing to perjure herself on the stand in order to obtain convictions. One of them is even known to have conducted pre-trial investigation of a defendant.
The motivation for these public officials is partly derived from the fact that the BAP receives their funding, minus salaries, from a “DUI fund” paid for through DL reinstatement fees and other defendant paid costs. They have a significant financial interest in obtaining convictions.
Of course, all of this is well beyond their stated mission and responsibilities. Appalling.

By: Court's Expert Now Called an 'Imposter' | PoliceMisconduct.net

Court's Expert Now Called an 'Imposter' | PoliceMisconduct.net — Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:45:04 +0000

[…] handling of the specimens and his interpretation of the test results.”H/T: DUI Blog Categories: In The News | Tags: Expert Testimony, Higher Standards, Not in America | Permalink […]