Inebriated or Texting: Which Is More Dangerous When Driving?

Posted by Lawrence Taylor on July 21st, 2009

Which is more deadly – driving while intoxicated or driving while texting?  Ok, so….which is a serious crime and which is not?


DWT Should Be as Socially Unacceptable as DUI

Halifax, Nova Scotia.  July 12  – DRIVING while intoxicated has become such a social taboo that most people recognize the acronym DUI (driving under the influence) used by police and prosecutors, and rightly so. But according to a growing body of research and empirical observation, DWT is a potentially worse hazard than DUI, and should be just as socially unacceptable as driving drunk.

DWT? That would be "driving while texting" (sub-category: driving while tweeting) — the most pernicious of a variety of distempers afflicting our culture as a consequence of pandemic cellphone addiction.

According to a U.K. Transport Research Laboratory study, commissioned by the Royal Automobile Club Foundation, motorists sending text messages while driving are "significantly more impaired" than ones who drive drunk. The study showed texters’ reaction times deteriorated by 35 per cent, and a whopping 91 per cent decrease in steering ability, while similar studies of drunk driving indicate reaction time diminishment of about 12 per cent. By that measure, DWT is three times more dangerous than DUI, and should logically be treated as severely, if not more so, both under the law and in terms of social censure…

Ongoing surveys by the U.S. National Highway Safety Administration show 85 per cent of all auto crashes and 65 per cent of all near-crashes result from distracted driving.

Laws banning texting behind the wheel are relatively rare as yet. Only a handful of U.S states have full or partial bans in place…


Hmmmm….Wonder why the folks screaming fatality statistics at MADD have been so silent?  Maybe it doesn’t fit their Prohibitionist agenda? 
 

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] We all know about the federal government’s MADD-influenced "War on Drunk Driving" during recent years, forced on the states with the threat of withholding highway funds.  More recently, however, we’ve learned that driving while using a cell phone — and especially driving while texting ("DWT") — is actually more dangerous to human life.  See my post a few days ago, Inebriated or Texting: Which is More Dangerous When Driving?.   […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — July 27, 2009 @ 12:14 pm

  2. […] repeatedly been proven more dangerous than drunk driving.  See, for example, Inebriated or Texting: Which is More Dangerous?.  If anyone still questions MADD’s underlying […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — August 3, 2009 @ 3:07 pm

  3. […] is driving while talking on a cell phone.  See, for example,  my previous posts Inebriated or Texting: Which is More Dangerous While Driving?  and Feds Crack Down on DUI…and Cover Up […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — August 11, 2009 @ 10:29 am


Comments

  1. Previously you wrote about the Michael Cyr case here in CT. I am familiar with the individual and case. He was arrested for DUI because he used a car starter to start his car even though the did not insert the key into the ignition, nor drive. The courts upheld the conviction. Under the same thought process, will we get arrested for DWT by having a cell phone on when we enter a car?

    Comment by Had Enough — July 24, 2009 @ 5:27 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.