<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drunk Driving Entrapment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2009/07/07/drunk-driving-entrapment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/07/07/drunk-driving-entrapment/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 01:49:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: standup</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/07/07/drunk-driving-entrapment/comment-page-1/#comment-5469</link>
		<dc:creator>standup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1681#comment-5469</guid>
		<description>That went right by me Justin. I re-read it, now I agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That went right by me Justin. I re-read it, now I agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/07/07/drunk-driving-entrapment/comment-page-1/#comment-5378</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 05:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1681#comment-5378</guid>
		<description>From what I Saw it said he was escorted to his truck and told to leave - obviously the cop is telling him to get into the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I Saw it said he was escorted to his truck and told to leave &#8211; obviously the cop is telling him to get into the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: standup</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/07/07/drunk-driving-entrapment/comment-page-1/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>standup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1681#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>Where I&#039;m a wee bit hazy here is, did the officer order him to &quot;leave&quot; (as in walk away) or did the officer order him to get in his vehichle and drive away ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where I&#8217;m a wee bit hazy here is, did the officer order him to &#8220;leave&#8221; (as in walk away) or did the officer order him to get in his vehichle and drive away ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David W</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/07/07/drunk-driving-entrapment/comment-page-1/#comment-3965</link>
		<dc:creator>David W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 06:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1681#comment-3965</guid>
		<description>Just one question concerning the courts rational here..Lets say the &quot;drunk &quot;brother didn&#039;t hit the patrol car in his attempt to depart the parking lot per the officer&#039;s &quot;orders&quot;. And order was what it was.

So lets say he left sucessfully then got in a headon collision that resulted in death.

I&#039;d really like to see what rational the court would use in regard to a senerio like that if it had happened. I remember reading about this case a while back and still can&#039;t phantom how the court ruled the way it did. The man gets told by a public  servant with a badge and gun to depart the premises, yet are found to not be responsible for any implications that may take place after &quot;ordering&quot; a citizen to do something, which, as this case showed, involved putting the public at risk if this person was actually drunk.

So much for public safety..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one question concerning the courts rational here..Lets say the &#8220;drunk &#8220;brother didn&#8217;t hit the patrol car in his attempt to depart the parking lot per the officer&#8217;s &#8220;orders&#8221;. And order was what it was.</p>
<p>So lets say he left sucessfully then got in a headon collision that resulted in death.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d really like to see what rational the court would use in regard to a senerio like that if it had happened. I remember reading about this case a while back and still can&#8217;t phantom how the court ruled the way it did. The man gets told by a public  servant with a badge and gun to depart the premises, yet are found to not be responsible for any implications that may take place after &#8220;ordering&#8221; a citizen to do something, which, as this case showed, involved putting the public at risk if this person was actually drunk.</p>
<p>So much for public safety..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
