Comments on: Convicted of Drunk Driving…Without Driving

By: elemansayfasi

elemansayfasi — Fri, 08 Jun 2012 17:05:56 +0000

Great blog right here! Additionally your web site rather a lot up fast! What web host are you the use of? Can I get your associate link on your host? I wish my site loaded up as quickly as yours lol

By: RichardAlan

RichardAlan — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:31:04 +0000

We are all waiting for one lawyer to come on this thread and explain why this information in law is NOT being used during per se hearings in DMV procedure? –to protect the sovereignty of private free citizens, who exercise their constitutional rights.

I’m gonna guess that because all attorneys are sworn to the “Bar” which is sanctioned by the State, that if an attorney were to “Really” to the job in protecting his client he’d be disbarred by the state and charged with contempt, then thrown in jail. (?)

By: RichardAlan

RichardAlan — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:24:41 +0000

This is from case law. Why are not defense attorney’s sighting this case law? Why was my license taken from me for claiming my legal rights during a traffic stop? Why didn’t my or your attorney do anything based on the following? What is wrong in this country?

Why does it appear that all attorneys seem to be Frauds?

“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491.
and…

“The claim and exercise of a constitutional Right cannot be converted into a crime.” Miller vs. U.S., 230 F. 486, 489.
and…

“There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional Rights.” Snerer vs. Cullen, 481 F. 946.
Streets and highways are established and maintained for the purpose of travel and transportation by the public. Such travel may be for business or pleasure.

“The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and ransportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental Right of which the public and the individual cannot be rightfully deprived.” [emphasis added] Chicago Motor Coach vs. Chicago, 169 NE 22; Ligare vs. Chicago, 28 NE 934; Boon vs. Clark, 214 SSW 607; 25 Am.Jur. (1st) Highways Sect.163.

By: standup

standup — Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:37:41 +0000

So what’s next ?? Getting arrested for being drunk in your own home,while your car is in the garage, and you have the keys to it on your coffee table ?

By: David W

David W — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 17:49:47 +0000

This isn’t crazy, it’s insane.

Utter speculation of MADD’s “you might” philosophy. So I guess the next time you are tired, pull into a rest area to get some sleep, have tour doors locked but your keys in the car, you will not be charged with a dui, but you will be charged with being to impaired to operate a motor vehicle.

Have these justices drank too much alcohol during the course of their lifetime or what? After all Laura Dean Mooney claims alcohol use leads to these types of problems. Comprehension problems to be specific.

This is wrong. Any kindergarden student could figure that out (unless MADD got to them first)