<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice vs Profits: Guess Which Wins&#8230;Again?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2009/01/13/justice-vs-profits-guess-which-winsagain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/01/13/justice-vs-profits-guess-which-winsagain/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/01/13/justice-vs-profits-guess-which-winsagain/comment-page-1/#comment-2162</link>
		<dc:creator>DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 19:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1351#comment-2162</guid>
		<description>[...] However,&#160;manufacturers continue to hide what&#8217;s inside the &quot;black boxes&quot; &#8212; apparently afraid of what will be foound.&#160; And they are becoming&#160;increasingly&#160;clever in their efforts to evade court-ordered disclosure.&#160; In Arizona, for example,&#160;a court ordered disclosure &#8212; but then refused to hold the manufacturer in contempt when its attorney argued that the&#160;court had no&#160;jursdiction since&#160;the corporation did not do any business in Arizona (despite the fact that it was, in fact,&#160;doing business&#160;by selling the machines to Arizona law enforcement agencies).&#160; See Justice vs Profits: Guess Which Wins&#8230;Again? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] However,&nbsp;manufacturers continue to hide what&#8217;s inside the &quot;black boxes&quot; &#8212; apparently afraid of what will be foound.&nbsp; And they are becoming&nbsp;increasingly&nbsp;clever in their efforts to evade court-ordered disclosure.&nbsp; In Arizona, for example,&nbsp;a court ordered disclosure &#8212; but then refused to hold the manufacturer in contempt when its attorney argued that the&nbsp;court had no&nbsp;jursdiction since&nbsp;the corporation did not do any business in Arizona (despite the fact that it was, in fact,&nbsp;doing business&nbsp;by selling the machines to Arizona law enforcement agencies).&nbsp; See Justice vs Profits: Guess Which Wins&#8230;Again? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/01/13/justice-vs-profits-guess-which-winsagain/comment-page-1/#comment-2141</link>
		<dc:creator>DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1351#comment-2141</guid>
		<description>[...] DUI Sobriety Checkpoints: Unconstitutional?          &#171; Justice vs Profits: Guess Which Wins&#8230;Again? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] DUI Sobriety Checkpoints: Unconstitutional?          &laquo; Justice vs Profits: Guess Which Wins&#8230;Again? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: standup</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2009/01/13/justice-vs-profits-guess-which-winsagain/comment-page-1/#comment-2138</link>
		<dc:creator>standup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=1351#comment-2138</guid>
		<description>I probably watch too much TV, but can&#039;t the defense attorney just ask the judge to throw out / not admit the breath test results ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I probably watch too much TV, but can&#8217;t the defense attorney just ask the judge to throw out / not admit the breath test results ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

