<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Immaculate Intoxication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2008/09/11/immaculate-intoxication-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/09/11/immaculate-intoxication-2/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 01:11:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan.</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/09/11/immaculate-intoxication-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1835</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=757#comment-1835</guid>
		<description>I remembered a TV show about this, so I had to look it up.  Harrigan &amp; son (Pat O&#039;Brien lawyer show, 1961).  One episode had a fellow on trial for being drunk but had taken &quot;the pledge.&quot;  Turned out his intentinal tract trapped the materials needed to produce alcohol.  Acquitted when he got drunk in court after eating some crackers.  
So this isn&#039;t a newly discovered phenomena, I&#039;d wager.
Dan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remembered a TV show about this, so I had to look it up.  Harrigan &amp; son (Pat O&#8217;Brien lawyer show, 1961).  One episode had a fellow on trial for being drunk but had taken &#8220;the pledge.&#8221;  Turned out his intentinal tract trapped the materials needed to produce alcohol.  Acquitted when he got drunk in court after eating some crackers.<br />
So this isn&#8217;t a newly discovered phenomena, I&#8217;d wager.<br />
Dan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichardAlan</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/09/11/immaculate-intoxication-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator>RichardAlan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 14:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=757#comment-1708</guid>
		<description>This is very intriguing, so a machine will get you convicted of a crime that you did not truthfully commit? 

I wonder if this is why the CHP alleged to have smelled of alcohol on me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very intriguing, so a machine will get you convicted of a crime that you did not truthfully commit? </p>
<p>I wonder if this is why the CHP alleged to have smelled of alcohol on me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koivisto</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/09/11/immaculate-intoxication-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>koivisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 22:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=757#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>Mr. Taylor, now I&#039;m afraid to drive! Just kidding of course but this sheds light on arrests made when people swore they only had one or two drinks. Even a small percentage bears consideration of how the current DUI laws work. I hold that the best solution is criminal liability for any accidents or deaths caused. DUI would be legal, but those causing harm and damage would have to face the music, and eventually you would see the numbers drop. Maybe I&#039;m wrong, but who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Taylor, now I&#8217;m afraid to drive! Just kidding of course but this sheds light on arrests made when people swore they only had one or two drinks. Even a small percentage bears consideration of how the current DUI laws work. I hold that the best solution is criminal liability for any accidents or deaths caused. DUI would be legal, but those causing harm and damage would have to face the music, and eventually you would see the numbers drop. Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/09/11/immaculate-intoxication-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=757#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>The courts continue to ignore science, and while this is a fascinating find, courts aren&#039;t even willing to acknowledge that BAC affects different body types differently.  The police and law enforcement want pre-packaged convictions, nothign thaty they may have to work for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The courts continue to ignore science, and while this is a fascinating find, courts aren&#8217;t even willing to acknowledge that BAC affects different body types differently.  The police and law enforcement want pre-packaged convictions, nothign thaty they may have to work for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
