<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ignition Interlock Devices: The View from the Prosecution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yumacat</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/comment-page-1/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator>Yumacat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 17:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=750#comment-2101</guid>
		<description>It is easy to stop the &quot;erosion&quot; of our rights:  Make the BAC level to drive 0.00 - NONE.  In this way devices only have to detect the presence of alcohol and not its level, which will prevent attorneys from getting rich trying to fight to accuracy of devices, which is the cause of so much litigation surrounding DUI prosecution.   It wonâ€™t matter if the BAC is .0799 or .0800; you either have alcohol in your system or you do not: period!

I know, some will see this as a ridiculous solution; however, use just a little bit of reason.  I think even alcoholics and drug addicts would agree that it is wrong that people get killed by â€œdrunkâ€ drivers (although the average drunk drivers will never admit that they are one of them).  The reasonable solution is to completely separate driving from consumption of alcohol like is done for pilots, truck drivers, etc.  Now, some may think it is their right to play with fire and drink before getting behind the wheel, but driving after drinking is not a guaranteed right of the Constitution of which I am aware.  People are still free to drink all they want; they just cannot drive after consuming an alcoholic beverage.  People can drive all they want, just not after consuming an alcoholic beverage.  It makes total sense except for those that make money off drunk driving and those alcoholics who drive drunk and who create excuses in an attempt justify why their obviously wrong behavior is somehow right.  

I know: MADD is going after our rights; we are going to have Marines stopping us in the streets; intoxilyzers are inaccurate; vampire cops are strapping us down to get our blood, slurred speech is not a sign of DUI; yes, everything is wrong with the world except that thousands of idiots think it is OK for them to drink and drive.  It is like arguing with my five year old why it is not OK for him to play in the street.  Letâ€™s grow up, act like adults, stop putting innocent lives in danger and keep the blood money out of the pockets of the DUI attorneys and corporate CEOs.  

I know, its hard to accept this; after all, judgment is the first thing to go when a person starts to drink â€“ but not your judgment, of course; youâ€™re fine and only had two beers...  blah, blah, blah  -  Sober up! Grow up! Stay off the same roads as my family!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easy to stop the &#8220;erosion&#8221; of our rights:  Make the BAC level to drive 0.00 &#8211; NONE.  In this way devices only have to detect the presence of alcohol and not its level, which will prevent attorneys from getting rich trying to fight to accuracy of devices, which is the cause of so much litigation surrounding DUI prosecution.   It wonâ€™t matter if the BAC is .0799 or .0800; you either have alcohol in your system or you do not: period!</p>
<p>I know, some will see this as a ridiculous solution; however, use just a little bit of reason.  I think even alcoholics and drug addicts would agree that it is wrong that people get killed by â€œdrunkâ€ drivers (although the average drunk drivers will never admit that they are one of them).  The reasonable solution is to completely separate driving from consumption of alcohol like is done for pilots, truck drivers, etc.  Now, some may think it is their right to play with fire and drink before getting behind the wheel, but driving after drinking is not a guaranteed right of the Constitution of which I am aware.  People are still free to drink all they want; they just cannot drive after consuming an alcoholic beverage.  People can drive all they want, just not after consuming an alcoholic beverage.  It makes total sense except for those that make money off drunk driving and those alcoholics who drive drunk and who create excuses in an attempt justify why their obviously wrong behavior is somehow right.  </p>
<p>I know: MADD is going after our rights; we are going to have Marines stopping us in the streets; intoxilyzers are inaccurate; vampire cops are strapping us down to get our blood, slurred speech is not a sign of DUI; yes, everything is wrong with the world except that thousands of idiots think it is OK for them to drink and drive.  It is like arguing with my five year old why it is not OK for him to play in the street.  Letâ€™s grow up, act like adults, stop putting innocent lives in danger and keep the blood money out of the pockets of the DUI attorneys and corporate CEOs.  </p>
<p>I know, its hard to accept this; after all, judgment is the first thing to go when a person starts to drink â€“ but not your judgment, of course; youâ€™re fine and only had two beers&#8230;  blah, blah, blah  &#8211;  Sober up! Grow up! Stay off the same roads as my family!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 20:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=750#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>Kovisto, how do you square a .10 DUI limit when right on this website there is an article by Larry stating that the limit was established at .15 in the 1930s by the AMA?

As for these vile devices, forget it, they don&#039;t work. They are just another fine the victim of our draconian society has to pay to drive again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kovisto, how do you square a .10 DUI limit when right on this website there is an article by Larry stating that the limit was established at .15 in the 1930s by the AMA?</p>
<p>As for these vile devices, forget it, they don&#8217;t work. They are just another fine the victim of our draconian society has to pay to drive again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: koivisto</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/comment-page-1/#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>koivisto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=750#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it once and I&#039;ll say it again, ban all liquor and our worries will go away.........
As I write this I hear crash after crash from those horrible DRUNKS. Every day when I drive to work it is a constant worry of mine to get to work on time due to the DUI roadblocks, fatal crashes, DRUNKS asleep at the wheel at a green light, they are every where and I&#039;m afraid to drive now, maybe a little drink to take the edge off? Not to downplay the issue but lets get serious. If you are suspected of DUI, them they should take you to a hospital for a blood test, with a limit of .10 as the line. If below, the police pay for the test and give you $1000 for your troubles, and when I say police, I mean the officer himself. If higher then put STRICT discipline in place, with jail time and very large fines. The officer would think twice and so would a driver. This would probably stop 99% of the trouble, but we would lose the precious revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it once and I&#8217;ll say it again, ban all liquor and our worries will go away&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br />
As I write this I hear crash after crash from those horrible DRUNKS. Every day when I drive to work it is a constant worry of mine to get to work on time due to the DUI roadblocks, fatal crashes, DRUNKS asleep at the wheel at a green light, they are every where and I&#8217;m afraid to drive now, maybe a little drink to take the edge off? Not to downplay the issue but lets get serious. If you are suspected of DUI, them they should take you to a hospital for a blood test, with a limit of .10 as the line. If below, the police pay for the test and give you $1000 for your troubles, and when I say police, I mean the officer himself. If higher then put STRICT discipline in place, with jail time and very large fines. The officer would think twice and so would a driver. This would probably stop 99% of the trouble, but we would lose the precious revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: standup</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/comment-page-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>standup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=750#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said it before, and I&#039;ll say it again. I&#039;ll bet MADD has $$ invested in these companies,or these companies have generously donated to MADD. The I.R.S.  and the S.E.C. should be on this like white on rice baby. In the meantime which company is the best one to invest in ? MADD won&#039;t tell me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again. I&#8217;ll bet MADD has $$ invested in these companies,or these companies have generously donated to MADD. The I.R.S.  and the S.E.C. should be on this like white on rice baby. In the meantime which company is the best one to invest in ? MADD won&#8217;t tell me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: standup</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2008/08/18/ignition-interlock-devices-the-view-from-the-prosecution/comment-page-1/#comment-1536</link>
		<dc:creator>standup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.duiblog.com/?p=750#comment-1536</guid>
		<description>MADD wants to get these gizmos in EVERY car of EVERY citizen. Not just in the cars of 2nd or first time offenders. Prohibition drip by drip...
Just little by little, make it more difficult to obtain or drink liquor for everyone.
I&#039;m staring down both barrels of Hurricane Fay right now, I better get busy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MADD wants to get these gizmos in EVERY car of EVERY citizen. Not just in the cars of 2nd or first time offenders. Prohibition drip by drip&#8230;<br />
Just little by little, make it more difficult to obtain or drink liquor for everyone.<br />
I&#8217;m staring down both barrels of Hurricane Fay right now, I better get busy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

