<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All U.S. Cars to Have Ignition Interlock Devices?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2006/11/20/all-us-cars-to-have-ignition-interlock-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/11/20/all-us-cars-to-have-ignition-interlock-devices/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUI BLOG: MADD Lobbying for Breathalyzers as Standard Equipment in All Future Cars</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/11/20/all-us-cars-to-have-ignition-interlock-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-22552</link>
		<dc:creator>DUI BLOG: MADD Lobbying for Breathalyzers as Standard Equipment in All Future Cars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/2006/11/20/all-us-cars-to-have-ignition-interlock-devices/#comment-22552</guid>
		<description>[...] In the wake of their recent success in requiring mandatory ignition interlock devices (IIDs) in the cars of drivers who have been convicted of drunk driving, Mothers Against Drunk Driving has been planning the next push: requiring IIDs in all cars.&#160;In other words, no car could be sold in the U.S. without devices which would require you to pass a breath test every time you wanted to start the vehicle. &#160;See All U.S. Cars To Have Ignition Interlock Devices? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] In the wake of their recent success in requiring mandatory ignition interlock devices (IIDs) in the cars of drivers who have been convicted of drunk driving, Mothers Against Drunk Driving has been planning the next push: requiring IIDs in all cars.&nbsp;In other words, no car could be sold in the U.S. without devices which would require you to pass a breath test every time you wanted to start the vehicle. &nbsp;See All U.S. Cars To Have Ignition Interlock Devices? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/11/20/all-us-cars-to-have-ignition-interlock-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 21:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/2006/11/20/all-us-cars-to-have-ignition-interlock-devices/#comment-111</guid>
		<description>[...] All U.S. Cars to Have Ignition Interlock Devices? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] All U.S. Cars to Have Ignition Interlock Devices? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

