<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mel Gibson Guilty of&#8230;.What?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2006/08/02/mel-gibson-guilty-of-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/08/02/mel-gibson-guilty-of-what/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:42:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/08/02/mel-gibson-guilty-of-what/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Aug 2006 23:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=387#comment-72</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I wonder if any investigations or tests have ever been done to determine if the mouth piece could be doctored with alcohol and how much it would change the readings.
By taking a hyprodermic syringe and inserting it into the plastic wrapper that encloses the mouth piece, dispensing some alcohol into it.&#160; Then limiting the suspects amount of choices to just a few, would certainly guarantee an arrest.&#160; It would be almost undetectable by the person taking the test, especially if they did have just a few before.
I would be curious to find out if this is possible and if it would alter the test results.
I ask because I think it would, and I also think that it has been done to get the arrests.&#160; To insure the financial stability of the unit... 
Oh please don&#039;t say the cops would NOT do that, I know better as does everyone else, read the papers, they pull something new everyday. 
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>I wonder if any investigations or tests have ever been done to determine if the mouth piece could be doctored with alcohol and how much it would change the readings.<br />
By taking a hyprodermic syringe and inserting it into the plastic wrapper that encloses the mouth piece, dispensing some alcohol into it.&nbsp; Then limiting the suspects amount of choices to just a few, would certainly guarantee an arrest.&nbsp; It would be almost undetectable by the person taking the test, especially if they did have just a few before.<br />
I would be curious to find out if this is possible and if it would alter the test results.<br />
I ask because I think it would, and I also think that it has been done to get the arrests.&nbsp; To insure the financial stability of the unit&#8230;<br />
Oh please don&#8217;t say the cops would NOT do that, I know better as does everyone else, read the papers, they pull something new everyday. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Velvet</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/08/02/mel-gibson-guilty-of-what/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Velvet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 02:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=387#comment-71</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Last night, august 2nd, Joe Scarborough on msnbc had one of his interns
drink enough to get to a .12% BAC to show what a lame excuse alcohol
was for Mel&#039;s ant-semitic tirade.&#160; That worked out all fine, the
young man consumed about 4 drinks in an hour registered a .12% on a
breathalyzer aministered by an actual deputy. The young man lucidly
went on to say how 4 drinks is not enough alcohol to make you say
really stupid stuff.&#160; Joe Scarborough pointed out the young man
wasn&#039;t slurring his speech and the deputy related how the young man
hadn&#039;t mistyped a single word while blogging throughout the show.&#160;
To end the experiment, the test subject was given a field sobriety test
which he passed.&#160; The whole segment might have been engineered to
make mel Gibson look like a jerk but all it really did was point out
what a crock of shit the .08 legal limit is.&#160; That kid on the show
proved he wasn&#039;t intoxicated but if he had been pulled over driving his
life would have ruined.&#160; </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Last night, august 2nd, Joe Scarborough on msnbc had one of his interns<br />
drink enough to get to a .12% BAC to show what a lame excuse alcohol<br />
was for Mel&#8217;s ant-semitic tirade.&nbsp; That worked out all fine, the<br />
young man consumed about 4 drinks in an hour registered a .12% on a<br />
breathalyzer aministered by an actual deputy. The young man lucidly<br />
went on to say how 4 drinks is not enough alcohol to make you say<br />
really stupid stuff.&nbsp; Joe Scarborough pointed out the young man<br />
wasn&#8217;t slurring his speech and the deputy related how the young man<br />
hadn&#8217;t mistyped a single word while blogging throughout the show.&nbsp;<br />
To end the experiment, the test subject was given a field sobriety test<br />
which he passed.&nbsp; The whole segment might have been engineered to<br />
make mel Gibson look like a jerk but all it really did was point out<br />
what a crock of shit the .08 legal limit is.&nbsp; That kid on the show<br />
proved he wasn&#8217;t intoxicated but if he had been pulled over driving his<br />
life would have ruined.&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
