<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Do You Know the Blood They Tested was Yours?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2006/03/31/how-do-you-know-the-blood-they-tested-was-yours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/03/31/how-do-you-know-the-blood-they-tested-was-yours/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tox Lab Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2006/03/31/how-do-you-know-the-blood-they-tested-was-yours/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Tox Lab Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2006 03:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=323#comment-59</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Our laboratory employs a procedure of running an aqueous alcohol &quot;blank&quot; between each of our intox assault cases. This simple process has two very important benefits:

It minimizes the possibility of &quot;carryover&quot; or the contamination of a sample by the previous one
It&#160;provides a mental key change in the process of consecutive sample preparations, preventing the chemist from moving directly from one case to another
Another &quot;break&quot; in the process of preparing sequential samples is the inclusion of a control at every 10th position (a trend started by California laboratories). Some other techniques that are beneficial to prevent the whole sample mix-up nightmare include always analyzing cases in ascending numerical order, only opening one envelope at a time, and doing a visual matchup of vial label to position on the GC sequence list. Small things, yes, but their cumulative effect among non-clueless crime lab personnel minimizes mix-up potential.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a></a>Our laboratory employs a procedure of running an aqueous alcohol &#8220;blank&#8221; between each of our intox assault cases. This simple process has two very important benefits:</p>
<p>It minimizes the possibility of &#8220;carryover&#8221; or the contamination of a sample by the previous one<br />
It&nbsp;provides a mental key change in the process of consecutive sample preparations, preventing the chemist from moving directly from one case to another<br />
Another &#8220;break&#8221; in the process of preparing sequential samples is the inclusion of a control at every 10th position (a trend started by California laboratories). Some other techniques that are beneficial to prevent the whole sample mix-up nightmare include always analyzing cases in ascending numerical order, only opening one envelope at a time, and doing a visual matchup of vial label to position on the GC sequence list. Small things, yes, but their cumulative effect among non-clueless crime lab personnel minimizes mix-up potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
