http://www.duiblog.com/2005/08/16/scientific-vs-legal-presumptions-in-dui-cases/ Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution Wed, 22 May 2013 01:11:06 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://www.duiblog.com/2005/08/16/scientific-vs-legal-presumptions-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-38 Lawrence Taylor Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:33:09 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=207#comment-38 <a></a>Thank you for the kind words... Lawrence Taylor Thank you for the kind words…
Lawrence Taylor

]]> http://www.duiblog.com/2005/08/16/scientific-vs-legal-presumptions-in-dui-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-37 unusedandunusable@gmail.com Wed, 17 Aug 2005 15:27:24 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=207#comment-37 <a></a>Lawrence, I wanted to thank you for having a fascinating and highly readable blawg.  Your emphasis on a narrow set of topics makes you highly focused; your fierce indignation and experience makes you both informative and challenging. I like your takes on the fraudulent presumptions used by legislatures, prosecutors, and courts to convict those who may in fact be both factually and legally innocent under the law - they are probably a violation of lenity, violation of justice, violation I would argue of the Constitution's due process requirements. I will be pointing to you in an upcoming post (primarily) about Third degree murder, which references your excellent recent post about the January train wreck disaster. Regards, Eh Nonymous Philadelphia Unused & Probably Unusable blog Lawrence,
I wanted to thank you for having a fascinating and highly readable blawg.  Your emphasis on a narrow set of topics makes you highly focused; your fierce indignation and experience makes you both informative and challenging.
I like your takes on the fraudulent presumptions used by legislatures, prosecutors, and courts to convict those who may in fact be both factually and legally innocent under the law – they are probably a violation of lenity, violation of justice, violation I would argue of the Constitution’s due process requirements.
I will be pointing to you in an upcoming post (primarily) about Third degree murder, which references your excellent recent post about the January train wreck disaster.
Regards,
Eh Nonymous
Philadelphia
Unused & Probably Unusable blog

]]>