Comments on: “The DUI Exception to the Constitution” http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/ Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:34:34 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Drunk Driving Permits « The Legal Satyricon http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-260991 Drunk Driving Permits « The Legal Satyricon Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:54:35 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-260991 [...] drunk driving laws, but I know that ours are a constitutional abomination. Lawrence Taylor’s The DUI Exception to the Constitution is a must [...] […] drunk driving laws, but I know that ours are a constitutional abomination. Lawrence Taylor’s The DUI Exception to the Constitution is a must […]

]]> By: A Christmas miracle of interfaith unity, and how it proves that the Pope and the Prophet Abraham both suck « The Legal Satyricon http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-192703 A Christmas miracle of interfaith unity, and how it proves that the Pope and the Prophet Abraham both suck « The Legal Satyricon Tue, 25 Dec 2012 03:38:58 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-192703 [...] more, trying to feel affection for those I might otherwise be indifferent about, drinking booze and dodging DUI checkpoints. Getting in touch with my inner child by enjoying the joy of my actual [...] […] more, trying to feel affection for those I might otherwise be indifferent about, drinking booze and dodging DUI checkpoints. Getting in touch with my inner child by enjoying the joy of my actual […]

]]> By: Alice Kinston http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-65534 Alice Kinston Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:15:01 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-65534 I’d need to test with you here. Which is not one thing I often do! I get pleasure from studying a put up that will make people think. Additionally, thanks for allowing me to remark! I’d need to test with you here. Which is not one thing I often do! I get pleasure from studying a put up that will make people think. Additionally, thanks for allowing me to remark!

]]> By: elf http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-13724 elf Tue, 12 Jan 2010 01:49:11 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-13724 i was charged with a refusal even after stating i have a physical condition that restricts my breathing capacity. the offer wrote down that i said i had an indnted chest bone than put a werid looking question mark. it said i puffed i didn't blow.that is all i could do was not offered blood or urine test. breathalyzer was done 2 hrs after i was arrested. it took a yr and very good counsel to get car breathalyzer waived. no one knew how to handle the situation. i researched online and didn't find any provision those who can can't do breathalyzer due to medical conditions. now i still have another yrs of bs dmv supervision. you pay to bring someone meeting verifications. have to write about the meeting topic 12 a month. i was suposed to go to three a week with no way to get there for a yr. here in fl for dui you have to attend a madd meeting. more $$$ for them. not mention a 100.00 cab ride for me to get there. ( its 20 miles away). i agree madd destories people's lives. its impossible to get a fair dui trial because madd has so much power. its almost 5 yrs since i was arrested and i am tired of dmv bs. i have done 2 yrs of supervision and have a this $$$ making bs. all this bs for case which lacked any evidence. i was charged with a refusal even after stating i have a physical condition that restricts my breathing capacity. the offer wrote down that i said i had an indnted chest bone than put a werid looking question mark. it said i puffed i didn’t blow.that is all i could do
was not offered blood or urine test. breathalyzer was done 2 hrs after i was arrested.

it took a yr and very good counsel to get car breathalyzer waived.
no one knew how to handle the situation.
i researched online and didn’t find any provision those who can can’t do breathalyzer due to medical conditions.

now i still have another yrs of bs dmv supervision. you pay to bring someone meeting verifications. have to write about the meeting topic 12 a month.
i was suposed to go to three a week with no way to get there for a yr.

here in fl for dui you have to attend a madd meeting. more $$$ for them. not mention a 100.00 cab ride for me to get there. ( its 20 miles away).

i agree madd destories people’s lives.

its impossible to get a fair dui trial because madd has so much power.

its almost 5 yrs since i was arrested and i am tired of dmv bs.
i have done 2 yrs of supervision and have a this $$$ making bs.

all this bs for case which lacked any evidence.

]]> By: Ron Paul Blog - Cuccinelli and Drunk Driving Laws http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-12987 Ron Paul Blog - Cuccinelli and Drunk Driving Laws Sat, 26 Dec 2009 19:53:27 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-12987 [...] the Constitution, but that essay has already been written by DUI lawyer Lawrence Taylor. In “The DUI Exception to the Constitution” Taylor explains how nearly every Constitutional protection designed to protect the rights of [...] […] the Constitution, but that essay has already been written by DUI lawyer Lawrence Taylor. In “The DUI Exception to the Constitution” Taylor explains how nearly every Constitutional protection designed to protect the rights of […]

]]> By: melee401 http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-1971 melee401 Sun, 23 Nov 2008 02:23:07 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-1971 It is not about justice, it is about MADD revenge upon the inocent masses. The MADD lot are a very sick people. They trash the memory of those killed in DUI fatalities by destroying the lives of hundreds of thousands of people who had nothing to do with anyone being hurt. They take homes from families, education from children, happiness from life all in hateful revenge to an unfortunate accident. They take our constitution from us and lay deliberate waste to life. theirs is no accident, theirs is cunningly calculated for maximum destruction to as many as possible. I think if I were a child of a MADD person I would rather die then to be brought up by them. They are hateful, vengeful power mongerers whose sole purpose in life is to force thier beliefs upon an other wise would be free nation. They are the enemy within and if we do not put an end to their antics we are not long to enjoy any freedoms not specifically sanctioned by them and those like them. It is not about justice, it is about MADD revenge upon the inocent masses.
The MADD lot are a very sick people. They trash the memory of those killed in DUI fatalities by destroying the lives of hundreds of thousands of people who had nothing to do with anyone being hurt.
They take homes from families, education from children, happiness from life all in hateful revenge to an unfortunate accident.
They take our constitution from us and lay deliberate waste to life. theirs is no accident, theirs is cunningly calculated for maximum destruction to as many as possible.
I think if I were a child of a MADD person I would rather die then to be brought up by them. They are hateful, vengeful power mongerers whose sole purpose in life is to force thier beliefs upon an other wise would be free nation.
They are the enemy within and if we do not put an end to their antics we are not long to enjoy any freedoms not specifically sanctioned by them and those like them.

]]> By: DUI Process Unconstitutional????? (great read) http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-1158 DUI Process Unconstitutional????? (great read) Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:37:18 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-1158 [...] (great read) Got this off a local stang thread by me. Really a good read. http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-d ... stitution/ [...] […] (great read) Got this off a local stang thread by me. Really a good read. http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-d … stitution/ […]

]]> By: frkby http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-937 frkby Wed, 07 May 2008 17:56:56 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-937 After having my first DUI (and ONLY traffic citation after driving 30 years), I was stopped for doing 30 in a 20 mph zone. I was under special driving priveledges, allowed to drive to and from work. After the officer took my license, he went back to his vehicle and ran it. When he came back to the car, he said he smelled alcohol (I had not been drinking) and had me do a Field Sobriety test. He indicated that I had failed a portion of the test (imagine that, after not having had a drink), where he cuffed me and took me 30 minutes away to the closest police station to administer a BAC. The machine registered a .001, which I though might be due to having some beers the night before (not quite 12 hours prior, when I did not drive). After more humiliation, and resigning myself to the fact that I am guilty until proven innocent, I called a cab, walked part of the way home, and had to have my husband retrieve the car at the impound lot for $100. This, I believe, is power out of control. Why can we not challenge these officers, who have less than a 2-year education, with power on the brain? I was not advised of my rights, by the way, only held in the back of a police squad car for 30 minutes, in 70 degree heat, in cuffs, with the windows rolled up. My pet would have fared much better (ASPCA would have intervened). I would like to have some official consider, that before some cad (self-rightous police officer on a power-trip) assumes the innocence or guilt of the common person, that they have exceptional training (let's talk more than the 2-year course at the local technical college), and use equipment (BAC) that fares better than a 20 percent margin of error. By the way, my son is a diabetic, and I can't wait until he is pulled over when he is hyperglycemic, and reads high on his BAC. I will hire the best lawyer in the state. Just looking for a fair system guaranteed by our forefathers, but not finding it without being in contempt of the court. After having my first DUI (and ONLY traffic citation after driving 30 years), I was stopped for doing 30 in a 20 mph zone. I was under special driving priveledges, allowed to drive to and from work. After the officer took my license, he went back to his vehicle and ran it. When he came back to the car, he said he smelled alcohol (I had not been drinking) and had me do a Field Sobriety test. He indicated that I had failed a portion of the test (imagine that, after not having had a drink), where he cuffed me and took me 30 minutes away to the closest police station to administer a BAC. The machine registered a .001, which I though might be due to having some beers the night before (not quite 12 hours prior, when I did not drive). After more humiliation, and resigning myself to the fact that I am guilty until proven innocent, I called a cab, walked part of the way home, and had to have my husband retrieve the car at the impound lot for $100. This, I believe, is power out of control. Why can we not challenge these officers, who have less than a 2-year education, with power on the brain? I was not advised of my rights, by the way, only held in the back of a police squad car for 30 minutes, in 70 degree heat, in cuffs, with the windows rolled up. My pet would have fared much better (ASPCA would have intervened). I would like to have some official consider, that before some cad (self-rightous police officer on a power-trip) assumes the innocence or guilt of the common person, that they have exceptional training (let’s talk more than the 2-year course at the local technical college), and use equipment (BAC) that fares better than a 20 percent margin of error. By the way, my son is a diabetic, and I can’t wait until he is pulled over when he is hyperglycemic, and reads high on his BAC. I will hire the best lawyer in the state. Just looking for a fair system guaranteed by our forefathers, but not finding it without being in contempt of the court.

]]> By: Police Using DUI Roadblocks Illegally - DUI Blog http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-507 Police Using DUI Roadblocks Illegally - DUI Blog Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:40:12 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-507 [...] few years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court found yet another “DUI Exception the Constitution” in permitting police to set up roadblocks — even though they admittedly violated the Fourth [...] […] few years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court found yet another “DUI Exception the Constitution” in permitting police to set up roadblocks — even though they admittedly violated the Fourth […]

]]> By: 50 DUI cases dropped over improper procedure - Sportbikes.net http://www.duiblog.com/2005/05/09/the-dui-exception-to-the-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-453 50 DUI cases dropped over improper procedure - Sportbikes.net Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:28:46 +0000 http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=159#comment-453 [...] not a surprise: check out this page for some great dui info DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution [...] […] not a surprise: check out this page for some great dui info DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution […]

]]>