Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Testing During the Absorptive State

Posted by Lawrence Taylor on March 22nd, 2005

In previous posts, I have explained many of the reasons why breathalyzers are inaccurate and unreliable. See, for example, "Breathalyzers — and Why They Don’t Work"; "Warning: Breathalyzer in Use"; "Convicting the ‘Average’ DUI Suspect"; "Why Breathalyzers Don’t Measure Alcohol"; "Driving Under the Influence of… Gasoline?; "How to Fool the Breathalyzer". (These and many other sources of error are explained more fully in my book, Drunk Driving Defense, 6th edition.)

One of the most common sources of error in breath alcohol analysis is simply testing the subject too early — while his or her body is still absorbing the alcohol. Let’s take a common example. At a restaurant Sarah shares a bottle of wine with a friend. She nurses one glass over a one-hour dinner. Nearing the end, another glass is poured from the bottle and she finishes this. The two friends then order an after-dinner drink. Noting the time, Sarah quickly finishes the drink and leaves. She is stopped by the police one block from the restaurant. After questioning and field sobriety tests, she is taken to a police station and tested on a breathalyzer. The machine shows her blood alcohol concentration (BAC) to be .09% — over the legal limit. She is booked for DUI and jailed.

Sarah’s true BAC, however, was much lower. If a blood sample had been taken instead of a breath test, the results would have shown only .05% — well under the legal limit. Absorption of alcohol continues for anywhere from 45 minutes to two hours after drinking or even longer. Peak absorption normally occurs within an hour; this can range from as little as 15 minutes to as much as two-and-a-half hours. The presence of food in the stomach can delay this to as much as four hours, with two hours being common. During this absorptive phase, the distribution of alcohol throughout the body is not uniform; uniformity of distribution — called equilibrium — will not occur until absoprtion is complete. In other words, some parts of the body will have a higher blood alcohol concentration (BAC) than others.

One aspect of this non-uniformity is that the BAC in arterial blood will be higher than in veinous blood (laws generally require blood samples to be veinous). During peak absorption arterial BAC can be as much as 60 percent higher than veinous. This becomes very relevant to breath alcohol analysis because the alveolar sacs in the lungs are bathed by arterial blood, not veinous: The diffusion of alcohol through the sacs and into the lung air will reflect the BAC of the body’s arterial blood. Therefore, the breath sample obtained by the machine will be reflective of pulmonary BAC — which, during absorption, will be considerably higher than veinous BAC (and higher than the BAC in other parts of the body). After extensive research, one of the most noted experts in the field of blood alcohol analysis has concluded:

Breath testing is not a reliable means of estimating a subject’s blood alcohol concentration during absorption….. There is a significant likelihood that a given subject will be in the absorptive state when tested under field conditons. Because of large differences in arterial BAC and veinous BAC during absorption, breath test results consistently overestimate the result that would be obtained from a blood test — by as much as 100% or more. In order to have some idea of the reliability of a given breath test result, it is essential to determine by some objective means whether the subject is in the absorptive or post-absorptive state. In the absence of such information, an appropriate value for the uncertainty associated with the absorptive state should be applied to all breath test results.

Simpson, "Accuracy and Precision of Breath Alcohol Measurements for Subjects in the Absorptive State", 33(6) Clinical Chemistry 753 (1987). The most recognized expert in the field, Professor Kurt Dubowski of the University of Oklahoma, agrees with Simpson: "When a blood test is allowed, an administered breath test is discriminatory, because in law enforcement practice the status of absorption is always uncertain."

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] All states now have two drunk driving laws: (1) driving under the influence of alcohol (aka “DUI”, with local variations, such as “driving while intoxicated” or “DWI”), and (2) the so-called per se law of driving with .08% or higher blood-alcohol concentration (BAC). Most of those arrested will be charged and prosecuted for both offenses. The breath machines (commonly — and inaccurately — referred to as “Breathalyzers”) used to obtain the BAC are, obviously, critical to the drunk driving case. As for the per se offense, the only evidence of the crime is the machine: if the thing says .08% or higher and the jury believes it, the defendant is guilty. And even as to the DUI charge, the readings will be considered presumptive: if the BAC is .08% or higher, the jury will be instructed by the judge that the defendant is presumed guilty — and he must be found guilty unless he can prove his innocence (I’ve discussed this in “Whatever Happened to the Presumption of Innocence?“). These machines are all-important: they determine guilt or innocence. But their manufacturers continue to assure us that they are “state of the art”. So how accurate are they? Well, as I’ve written in the past, not very: Breathalyzers — and Why They Don’t Work Close Enough for Government Work The Mouth Alcohol Problem Breathalyzers: Why Aren’t They Warranted to Measure Alcohol? Driving Under the Influence of….Bread? Warning: Breathalyzer in Use Breath Fresheners and Breathalyzers Diabetes and the Counterfeit DUI Why Breathalyzers Don’t Measure Alcohol Can Body Temperature Affect Breathalyzer Results? The Effect of Anemia of Breath Tests GERD, Acid Reflux and False Breathalyzer Results Driving Under the Influence of….Gasoline? Do Breathalyzers Discriminate Against Women? Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Testing During the Absorptive State Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Post-Absorptive Breathalyzer Inaccuracy….It Gets Worse Warning: Smoking Can be Hazardous to Breathalyzer Results How to Fool the Breathalyzer Breathalyzer Manufacturers Won’t Tell How They Work […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — December 11, 2006 @ 2:59 pm

  2. […] Breathalyzers — and Why They Don’t Work Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Testing During the Absorptive Stage Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Post-Absorptive Breathalyzer Inaccuracy….It Gets Worse “Close Enough for Government Work” Why Breathalyzers Don’t Measure Alcohol How to Fool the Breathalyzer Breathalyzers and Radio Frequency Interference Breathalyzers: Why Aren’t They Warranted to Measure Alcohol? Share: […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — December 21, 2006 @ 1:07 pm

  3. […] These machines are all-important: they determine guilt or innocence. But their manufacturers continue to assure us that they are “state of the art”. So how accurate are they? Well, as I’ve written in the past, not very: Breathalyzers — and Why They Don’t Work Close Enough for Government Work The Mouth Alcohol Problem Breathalyzers: Why Aren’t They Warranted to Measure Alcohol? Driving Under the Influence of….Bread? Warning: Breathalyzer in Use Breath Fresheners and Breathalyzers Diabetes and the Counterfeit DUI Why Breathalyzers Don’t Measure Alcohol Can Body Temperature Affect Breathalyzer Results? The Effect of Anemia of Breath Tests GERD, Acid Reflux and False Breathalyzer Results Driving Under the Influence of….Gasoline? Do Breathalyzers Discriminate Against Women? Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Testing During the Absorptive State Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Post-Absorptive Breathalyzer Inaccuracy….It Gets Worse Warning: Smoking Can be Hazardous to Breathalyzer Results How to Fool the Breathalyzer Breathalyzer Manufacturers Won’t Tell How They Work […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — January 23, 2007 @ 1:36 pm

  4. […] Breathalyzer Inaccuracy: Testing During the Absorptive State […]

    Pingback by DUI BLOG : Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution — April 20, 2008 @ 7:31 am


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.