<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuberculosis, AIDS and Breathalyzers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.duiblog.com/2005/01/03/tuberculosis-aids-and-breathalyzers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2005/01/03/tuberculosis-aids-and-breathalyzers/</link>
	<description>Bad Drunk Driving Laws, False Evidence and a Fading Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 02:26:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.duiblog.com/2005/01/03/tuberculosis-aids-and-breathalyzers/comment-page-1/#comment-82150</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://duiblog.level2hosting.com/?p=79#comment-82150</guid>
		<description>I recall coming across a published study from California jails analyzing contaminants w/in &quot;properly cleaned&quot; breathalyzer machines. The results found that clean, didn&#039;t mean sterile, as organisms such as TB were present at infective levels. Having difficulty finding this again, any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall coming across a published study from California jails analyzing contaminants w/in &#8220;properly cleaned&#8221; breathalyzer machines. The results found that clean, didn&#8217;t mean sterile, as organisms such as TB were present at infective levels. Having difficulty finding this again, any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
